My number 1 reason for keeping it up is being able to search a log of my thoughts over the last 6 years, which otherwise would never have been recorded. I probably read my blog more than anyone else, and I see no shame in that.

btw: I do hate the “monetized” blogs… fuck them indeed!

Idiot.

You know nothing of evolution and have no desire to learn anything about it because you’re afraid of what you consider ‘the dark’. I will say again: idiot.

Over and over in Divine truth we read this phrase “after their kind”. One almost comes to the conclusion that “ok we get the point” kind of thinking. Why out of His eternal genius would the Holy Spirit decide to use this phrase so many times?? He knew that truth shortly after He inspired these words would be under attack and would remain under attack until the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Yet lets look at this phrase for a second. God created each species of animal after their own kind. So God did not create 1/2 fish 1/2 birds/ He did not create 1/2 man 1/2 primate. The Bible is clear that God created each living creature after their kind. Now there existed a gene pool within each kind if you will. The potential for a many variety of dogs existed within the created dog, and we see the results of this today. We see many varities of dogs, my mom has a poodle that drives me crazy. Yet we never see in the fossil record or from any other evidence, a dog transitioning into a cat. God out of His creative genuis confined the species to be able to breed only within a given species. Never do we see a giraffe being able to breed with a donkey. God has set boundaries.

Natural Selection as coined by the evolutionist is the process that removes qualities that are less favorable for the conditions and as a result new spieces are formed.
Natural selection is the process by which favorable heritable traits become more common in successive generations of a population of reproducing organisms, and unfavorable heritable traits become less common, due to differential reproduction of genotypes. Over time, this process may result in adaptations that specialize organisms for particular ecological niches and may eventually result in the emergence of new species. In other words, natural selection is the mechanism by which evolution may take place within a given population of organisms.

Never have we seen in the fossil record or from the naked eye emergence of new species. http://www.icr.org/natural-selection/ The battle for truth is still being waged

It isn’t science…IT just IS, the Great I AM

You’re just spewing out the old evolutionist garbage – the fact is there are NO non-debatable transitional fossils. Oh yes, you’ll here about this fossil and that fossil and they’re all presented as if they are bonafide irrefutable proof but, the fact is, there is none. If there were, creationists would have conceded long ago. In fact, if you compare what evolution said 20 years ago in regard to cold, hard factual transitional fossils, you will find that the evolutionists ideas have changed a great deal also. Now, that doesn’t stop National Geographic or any other publicly read ’science’ magazine from declaring the ‘overwhelming proof’ for evolution but, truth is, there is none. Bottom line – don’t believe anything you read that states the proof for evolution as if it’s fact, cause the whole neo-D ToE is nothing more than a fanciful hypothesis that is suffering from an extreme case of frustration due to lack of that elusive evidence that just doesn’t want to come on out.
Also, don’t ever be intimidated by the those who claim to be highly intellectual or intelligent – they will use this tactic to try to intimidate – don’t fear them – it’s hot air.

Later…

Archaeopteryx = shares some things in common with birds.

Archaeopteryx = line went extinct.

Archaeopteryx = not the ancestor of modern birds.

Birds = came about through evolutionary means similar to that which caused archeopteryx.

And yes, I have read about the few scientists who have shown a lack of interest in the reptile to bird branch of the tree. However, even if birds didn’t descend from dinosaurs (genetics pretty much confirms that they did), that is not a blow to evolutionary theory at all.

We’re simply realizing our mistakes as it relates to the evolution of birds. But again, I doubt that this will become a majority view any time soon.

It’s an incomplete transition at that, because its line likely went extinct. Birds do not descend from Archaeopteryx, but it’s entirely likely that birds came about as a result of evolution in which the end result was similar to Archaeopteryx.